Sigma 14mm f/2.8 EX HSM RF Aspherical Ultra Wide Angle Lens for Minolta and Sony SLR Cameras | 
 enlarge | Brand: Sigma
Category: Photography
List Price: $1,119.99
Buy New: $799.89
You Save: $320.10 (29%)
New (2) from $799.89
Avg. Customer Rating:  6 reviews
Color: Minolta
Media: Electronics
Fragile: No
Batteries Included: No
Maximum Focal Length: 14
Minimum Focal Length: 14
Size: Minolta
Shipping Weight (lbs): 2.3
Dimensions (in): 5.5 x 5.4 x 5.1
MPN: B0000501T3
Model: B0000501T3
UPC: 085126461348
EAN: 0085126461348
ASIN: B0000501T3
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Features:
| • | Dedicated to Minolta AF SLR cameras | | • | Extra-wide aspherical lens provides higher optical performance | | • | Antiflare features and crisp-to-the-edges images | | • | World's shortest, nonfisheye, wide-angle focal length AF lens | | • | Accepts rear slip-in gelatin filters |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
This large aperture F2.8 lens has an angle of view of 114 and it makes high quality images a reality. This large aperture lens offers an outstanding cost performance and has an angle of view of 114. Equipped with SLD lens glasses and aspherical lenses for high image quality 2 elements of aspherical lenses and 2 elements of SLD glass is being used to compensate aberrations and vignetting. It has minimum focusing distance is 18cm(7.1in.), and maximum magnification ratio of 1: 4.5.The HSM models for Sigma, Nikon and Canon mount provide ultra quiet high-speed autofocusing as well as full-time manual focus override. An inner focus system provides high performance and convenience. The lens also incorporates a built-in lens hood and a gelatin filter holder behind the rear lens element.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 1 more reviews...
 Little heavy, but good lens. December 25, 2007
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Just got this lens as a Christams gift, and I'm really impressed with it. It's a little soft at the edges wide open, but if you stop it down a bit, you get most of the corner sharpness back. It's also a little heavier than I'm used to, and I was suprized by how large it is. Nonetheless, it's a great lens for the landscapes I like shooting.
 Great Lens! September 2, 2007
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
The Sigma 14mm f2.8 is a great lens. It does a good job of keeping line straight. As others have stated you need to stop down (5.6 or higher) to keep sharp focus. That's the case with most very wide angle lenses. It is difficult to focus as others as said. That's just the nature of very wide angle lenses. If you shooting something up close then let the auto-focus do it for you. It you want to make certain it's in focus then measure (the old fashioned way). I've shot numerous projects with this lens and find to be major player in the very wide angle lens field. I've shot home exteriors, home interiors, art gallery interiors and even food with this lens.
My only issue with this lens is that it does not handle blowout hot spots well. It tends to shift the color on the fringes of the hot spot to the yellow. You just need to be careful not blowout hot spots which why I gave 4 stars instead of 5 stars.
Mine is fine... April 3, 2007
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
As another reviewer said earlier, sometimes the QA from Sigma is hit or miss. I have had the same experience in the past. The last 2 Sigmas I have tried have been fine (14 and 150 macro) My copy of this lens for Nikon is pretty nice (sharp, decent contrast if you keep light off the front element, fast accurate focus) on digital bodies. The HSM on mine is just as quiet as any of the AF-S Nikon lenses I have. I still prefer Nikon in general, but for the limited use I have for this lens, it has worked nicely.
 never February 22, 2006
4 out of 33 found this review helpful
do a little research and don't be fooled. Sigmas are generally a hit or miss thing for the lease quality. And wordt off if you travel and with the camera..seals are not at all reliable. Last but not least go ito a store and compare the drive noise on this unit to any other brand...very very noise...sorry i can not recommend them. Nikon, Tamron, Tokina...I personally prefer Nikon and Tokina...good luck
 Good on a digital SLR August 4, 2002
13 out of 14 found this review helpful
My copy of this lens gives good image quality, though it does have slight barrel distortion (things near the edge of the field of view bulge out very slightly). This is typical for this wide of a lens, and isn't noticeable unless viewing something with lots of straight lines near and parallel to the edge of the frame.
I like the lens, but do make sure you really want a lens with a field of view THIS WIDE. It's nice for landscapes, but they will all have everything but the kitchen sink in each shot. You can't use this lens to isolate a particular feature of interest like you can with a standard or a telephoto lens.
One feature nobody seems to pay much attention to on this lens is that it can focus very close! You can do a sort of wide-angle macro work with this lens, if the light is good.
I recommend it as a relatively affordable alternative to the Canon or Tamron equivalents, if you are sure a 14mm lens is something you really want. I like mine, but occasionally have second thoughts about needing a lens this wide. Finally, I should mention that I use a digital SLR which only uses the central 2/3 of the lens. I've seen reports from others saying that edge distortion on this lens is unacceptable with a full-frame film camera.
|
|
|
