Oregon Scientific DS6310-B 3MP ThinCam Digital Camera with Cradle (Blue) |  | Brand: Oregon Scientific
Category: Photography
List Price: $119.95
Buy New: $79.95
as of 8/1/2010 01:47 EDT details
You Save: $40.00 (33%)
New (4) from $79.95
Seller: Online Components
Rating:  17 reviews
Sales Rank: 85613
Color: Oregon Scientific DS6310-B 3MP Digital Camera (Blue)
Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Batteries Included: No
Floppy Disk Drive: None
Optical Zoom: 1
Display Size: 1.5
Minimum Focal Length: 8.2
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 9 x 8.3 x 2.8
MPN: DS6310-B
Model: DS6310-B
UPC: 734811316080
EAN: 0734811316080
ASIN: B000BK7R78
Release Date: November 15, 2005
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | 3.0 megapixel CMOS sensor produces images of up to 2032 x 1524 pixels | | • | Features built-in flash, 4x digital zoom and a 1.5-inch color TFT display | | • | Includes USB transfer cradle, software, USB cable, rechargeable Li-Polymer battery, hand strap and carrying case | | • | Supports SD cards for extra memory | | • | Dimensions: 3.5 x 2.2 x 0.5 inches (WxHxD) |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
The perfect combination of size, image quality, and value! This micro-size digital camera takes great 3 megapixel pictures anytime,anywhere. It is small enough to carry in your pocket, has a built-in flash, 4x digital zoom and a 1.5? color TFT screen for
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 17
 Great Value for the Price! January 9, 2009
Jacqueline M. Muehlbauer (carrboro, nc)
For the price of $30, you can't ask for a better camera. I had to buy a memory card because the camera itself only held 10 pictures but that is OK.
 Don't buy CMOS cameras May 6, 2008
Sylvia (NY/NJ)
Most good digital cameras use CCD lens technology. CMOS is old, normally used for security cameras. Even though I don't own this camera (and I generally hate reading reviews by people who don't own the product), I have owned a Polaroid camera of similar specs & price - with a CMOS lens. It mysteriously died in less than a year (company would service, but it would cost almost as much as purchase price for part) and picture quality was horrible. I regret not having done my research, b/c I took pics of my first baby with it and now with my second baby on a Canon, I can totally see the difference in quality.
General tip I've learned: if the company doesn't have a history of making cameras (35mm cameras), then don't trust it! (Kodak and Fuji are probably OK, but not the best.) I remember Oregon Scientific from the calculators I used while I was flunking calculus...!
 Small lightweight camera June 1, 2007
Edward H. Sessions (Kissimmee, Florida USA)
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
This camera takes good pictures for being so compact. A little difficult at the begining to take a picture, but after I followed the instructions it was a snap.
NOT WORTH IT January 16, 2007
J. moore (GRANTS PASS, OR United States)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
PICTURE QUALITY FOR A 3 MEGAPIXEL CAMERA IS VERY DISAPPOINTING! THE ONLY GOOD THING IS ITS SMALL SIZE. WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THIS CAMERA FOR ANYTHING BUT A CHILDS TOY AND AT THE SELLING PRICE IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE FOR THAT.
Don't bother November 24, 2006
Gemstar
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
Extremely low quality pics. Short battery life. Not worth spending any money on.
I got this camera for free thank goodness. Now I am just trying to find a way to get rid of it.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 17
|
|
|
![Adobe Photoshop Elements 8 [Mac]](http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B002ID8R34.01._AA75_PU_PU-5_.jpg)
