Oregon Scientific DS6639 Slim 2.0MP Digital Camera (Orange) | 
 enlarge | Brand: Oregon Scientific
Category: Photography
Buy New: $74.95
Avg. Customer Rating:  10 reviews
Sales Rank: 48591
Color: Orange
Media: Electronics
Optical Zoom: 1
Display Size: 1.5
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9
Dimensions (in): 8.7 x 3.8 x 2.8
MPN: DS6639-O
UPC: 734811211583
EAN: 0734811211583
ASIN: B0007GFOGC
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Features:
| • | 2.0-megapixel sensor captures enough detail for photo-quality 8 x 11-inch prints | | • | Features built-in flash, 2x digital zoom, and 1.5-inch color TFT screen | | • | 8MB of internal memory (9 high- or 22 low-resolution pictures) | | • | Supports SD and MMC cards for extra memory | | • | PC (Windows 98 or higher) and Mac (G3 or higher with OS 9) compatible |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Product Description
The Oregon Scientific DS6639 Slim 2.0MP Digital Camera is a compact, state-of-the-art digital camera able to take 2.0-megapixel photos and record AVI digital movie clips anytime, anywhere. At about 3.5 inches wide by 2.5 inches long, it's small enough to carry in your pocket. The DS6639 is loaded with features, including a built-in flash, 2x digital zoom, a 1.5-inch color TFT screen for great quality pictures on the go, and an attractive orange-colored case. It is compatible with PCs using Windows 98/ME/2000/XP and Mac G3 or higher computers with OS 9 or above. Included among its many features are: - 2.0-megapixel CMOS sensor (1600 x 1200 pixel resolution)
- 8 MB of internal memory (9 high- or 22 low-resolution pictures)
- Movie mode
- Supports SD and MMC cards for extra memory
- Video output
What's in the Box
DS6639 digital camera, software, USB cable, video cable, 2 AAA batteries, hand strap, carrying case.
Product Description
Oregon Scientific (DS6639-O) Slim 2MP Digital Camera Orange
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 5 more reviews...
 Great gift for a teenager January 18, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Excellent value for the money - a great little camera if you don't need large prints (8x10 and bigger)!
great little camera February 19, 2007
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I bought 1 for my 13 yr old grandson. He may not get it. Love the small size and the little custom pouch has belt loop.I am shopping for more, for auto clove box.(perfect for accident photo). Also my other grandchildren and my nephew who drives otr long haul truck. Takes very nice pictures. Only negative for me is the slow flash recharge,
P.S.
our other digital cameras are 2 Olympus 740 ultra zoom, 1 of them I have added a 3x converter on it.
Best camera Available under $100 January 15, 2006
4 out of 4 found this review helpful
I have bought and used numerous digital cameras beginning in 1992. This little beauty with its many settings takes wonderful outdoor pictures in good light and mediocre pictures in low light, as expected. On rechargeable AAA batteries, I have gotten well over 100 pictures. It is small, sylish, light, comes with a nice case and cables. Overall, a nice nice camera for the price.
 piece of junk December 16, 2005
0 out of 2 found this review helpful
runs out of batteries in two seconds. picture quality is pretty bad.
No Battery Problem Here ! October 14, 2005
31 out of 31 found this review helpful
Purchased for my 13-year-old god-child, she loves it!! A great "point & shoot" camera for novice photographers; easy to use, small enough for purse or pocket, convenient for school, special events, or those "oh, I wish I had a picture of that" moments. Produces crisp & clear photos that are easily downloaded to the computer.
She easily fills a 128meg photocard (200+ photos) on a single set of batteries! Digital cameras take a lot of battery power, especially if you leave the LCD display and the "auto flash" on...A "aaa" NiMH rechargeable battery kit costs about $15 and batteries last from 4-10 times longer per-charge than conventional batteries and are generally good for about 300 "recharges" before replacement. Instead of $100s per year for batteries as was suggested, $15 every couple of years is more realistic.
|
|
|
